Introduction

Relevance of the Theme

The Argumentative Text: Critique is a crucial tool in the art of expressing opinions and analyses. Well-written, grounded criticism promotes constructive debates and contributes to the development of critical thinking.

• Role in Communication: Criticism is a means of communication solidified in all societies. Mastering the art of critique through argumentative text allows one to express opinions persuasively and effectively, thus influencing the thoughts and opinions of others.

• Cognitive Development: The ability to critique in a grounded and persuasive manner stimulates critical and analytical thinking. Moreover, argumentative writing contributes to the development of skills in analysis, synthesis, and organization of ideas.

• Linguistic Skills: The argumentative text involves various linguistic structures, such as argumentation, persuasion, and exposition of ideas. Mastery of these skills is essential for enhancing written expression.

Contextualization

The ability to produce an Argumentative Text: Critique is situated within the broader context of the Portuguese language curriculum. This theme is interconnected with reading, writing, and text interpretation skills, contributing to the development of more advanced linguistic abilities.

Besides being at the core of the Portuguese language curriculum, mastering this theme allows students to express their opinions and perspectives more assertively and convincingly. This theme prepares students for high school, where argumentative writing becomes even more important, and for life, where the ability to express oneself correctly is fundamental in any context.

Thus, understanding and mastering the Argumentative Text: Critique will provide students with a powerful tool for expressing their ideas, making them active and critical participants in society.

Theoretical Development

Components

The Critique

The Critique, within the argumentative text, is a grounded evaluation of a specific subject or theme. Although it is a personal reflection, it is capable of encompassing objective aspects that support the established opinion. The critique, in its essence, is the central axis of an argumentative text.

• Grounded Evaluation: Criticism is not merely a judgment, but rather an analysis that relies on arguments and evidence to justify the opinion issued. These foundations can be based on facts, theoretical references, personal experiences, among others.

• Objective Aspects: To enhance the strength of the critique, it is important to include objective elements that support it. In this case, verifiable information, statistics, concrete examples, among others, are considered.

The Argumentative Text

The Argumentative Text is a type of text whose purpose is to persuade or convince the interlocutor of a certain idea, thesis, point of view, or opinion. It is a logical and rational exposition of a particular subject, always accompanied by arguments.

• Proposition: The argumentative text always presents a thesis, a statement that one wishes to support and substantiate with arguments.

• Argumentation: The arguments are the reasons, justifications, or proofs that serve to support the proposed thesis. They can be of different types, such as arguments of authority, arguments by analogy, arguments by contrast, among others.

Structural Elements of the Argumentative Text

A well-constructed argumentative text has structural elements that organize it and give it cohesion and coherence. Among the main elements are:

• Introduction: It is the initial part of the argumentative text and serves to present the theme, the thesis to be defended, and to instigate the reader to continue reading.

• Development: In this part, the arguments are presented, discussed, and supported. There may be refutation of arguments contrary to the thesis.

• Conclusion: It is the final part of the text, where the thesis is reaffirmed and the main arguments presented are briefly recapitulated.

Key Terms

• Argumentative Text: It is a type of text that aims to defend an idea, opinion, or point of view. It presents a logical and rational structure, leading the reader to adhere to what is being proposed.

• Critique: It is an in-depth analysis of a theme, using arguments to support an opinion. It is characterized by reflection, pointing out qualities, flaws, positive and negative aspects of the object of analysis.

• Persuasion: It is the act of convincing someone else to adopt a certain opinion, point of view, or action. It is one of the main purposes of the argumentative text.

Examples and Cases

Example of Critique: Movie "The Journey"

"The Journey" is a movie that, although it has an interesting premise, gets lost in a complex and confusing narrative. The character development is shallow, and the dialogues, far from deepening the issues proposed by the plot, only contribute to the lack of clarity and cohesion of the story. The photography, although beautiful, fails to sustain the plot, and in the end, the feeling is that one has watched several disconnected stories. In summary, "The Journey" is a missed opportunity to tell an engaging story.

Example of Argumentative Text: Legalization of Marijuana

Introduction: The discussion around the legalization of marijuana is a topic that has been gaining more and more relevance. Given the high rates of violence related to drug trafficking and the growing acceptance of marijuana in various sectors of society, it is imperative to reassess the current prohibition policy.

Development: Various studies have shown that the prohibition of marijuana is not effective in reducing consumption, but rather in enhancing violence. Moreover, legalization could generate substantial revenues for the State, which could be invested in the prevention and treatment of chemical dependents. In other countries, controlled legalization has proven to be a promising path, with positive results in reducing trafficking and abusive consumption.

Conclusion: In light of these arguments, it is possible to conclude that the legalization of marijuana, when accompanied by adequate public policies, is a viable alternative that should be considered. Ignoring this possibility is to remain hostage to a policy of confronting trafficking that has proven ineffective and extremely costly for society.